inception-resnet-v2 | Implementation of Google 's Inception ResNet v2 | Machine Learning library
kandi X-RAY | inception-resnet-v2 Summary
kandi X-RAY | inception-resnet-v2 Summary
Implementation of Google's Inception + ResNet v2 architecture in Keras
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of inception-resnet-v2
inception-resnet-v2 Key Features
inception-resnet-v2 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on inception-resnet-v2
QUESTION
I've been trying to compare the InceptionResnetV2 model summary from Keras implementation with the one specified in their paper, and it doesn't seem to show much resemblance when it comes to the filter_concat block.
The first lines of the model summary()
are as shown below. (for my case, the input is changed to 512x512, but up to my knowledge, it doesn't affect the number of filters per layer, so we can also use them to follow up the paper-code translation):
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-27 at 08:00It achieves similar results.
I just received an e-mail confirming the error from Alex Alemi, Senior Research Scientist at Google and original publisher of the blog post regarding the release of the code for InceptionResnetV2. It seems that during internal experiments, the STEM blocks were switched and the release just kept like that.
Cite:
Dani Azemar,
It seems you're right. Not entirely sure what happened but the code is obviously the source of truth in the sense that the released checkpoint is for the code that is also released. When we were developing the architecture we did a whole slew of internal experiments and I imagine at some point the stems were switched. Not sure I have the time to dig deeper at the moment, but like I said, the released checkpoint is a checkpoint for the released code as you can verify yourself by running the evaluation pipeline. I agree with you that it seems like this is using the original Inception V1 stem. Best Regards,
Alex Alemi
I'll update this post with changes regarding this subject.
UPDATE: Christian Szegedy, also publisher of the original paper, just tweeted me:
The original experiments and model was created in DistBelief, a completely different framework pre-dating Tensorflow.
The TF version was added a year later and might have had discrepancies from the original model, however it was made sure to achieve similar results.
So, since it achieves similar results, your experiments would be roughly the same.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install inception-resnet-v2
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page